Identification of parameters in normal error component logit‐mixture (NECLM) models
正态误差成分 Logit 混合模型的参数识别AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要核心是 Logit 混合离散选择模型的参数识别、误差结构与归一化。
正态误差成分 Logit 混合模型的参数识别AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Abstract Although the basic structure of logit‐mixture models is well understood, important identification and normalization issues often get overlooked. This paper addresses issues related to the identification of parameters in logit‐mixture models containing normally distributed error components associated with alternatives or nests of alternatives ( normal error component logit mixture , or NECLM, models). NECLM models include special cases such as unrestricted, fixed covariance matrices; alternative‐specific variances; nesting and cross‐nesting structures; and some applications to panel data. A general framework is presented for determining which parameters are identified as well as what normalization to impose when specifying NECLM models. It is generally necessary to specify and estimate NECLM models at the levels, or structural, form. This precludes working with utility differences, which would otherwise greatly simplify the identification and normalization process. Our results show that identification is not always intuitive; for example, normalization issues present in logit‐mixture models are not present in analogous probit models. To identify and properly normalize the NECLM, we introduce the ‘equality condition’, an addition to the standard order and rank conditions. The identifying conditions are worked through for a number of special cases, and our findings are demonstrated with empirical examples using both synthetic and real data. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.