Confidence Sets for Phylogenetic Trees
系统发育树的置信集合AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究系统发育树空间的统计推断,未提供对应所列经济计量领域细分的依据。
反馈分类问题系统发育树的置信集合AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Inferring evolutionary histories (phylogenetic trees) has important applications in biology, criminology, and public health. However, phylogenetic trees are complex mathematical objects that reside in a non-Euclidean space, which complicates their analysis. While our mathematical, algorithmic, and probabilistic understanding of phylogenies in their metric space is mature, rigorous inferential infrastructure is as yet undeveloped. In this manuscript, we unify recent computational and probabilistic advances to construct tree–valued confidence sets. The procedure accounts for both center and multiple directions of tree–valued variability. We draw on block replicates to improve testing, identifying the best supported most recent ancestor of the Zika virus, and formally testing the hypothesis that a Floridian dentist with AIDS infected two of his patients with HIV. The method illustrates connections between variability in Euclidean and tree space, opening phylogenetic tree analysis to techniques available in the multivariate Euclidean setting. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.