跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究处理对照随机实验的设计、处理效应检验与功效计算。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Zach Branson
Xinran Li
Peng Ding

再随机化设计的检验功效与样本量计算

研究问题
以协变量平衡为目标的再随机化如何影响处理对照实验的检验功效,处理效应异质性又如何改变样本量规划?
方法与思路
作者建立再随机化实验的功效分析,用于样本量计算,并比较其与完全随机化在不同效应大小和异质性下的表现。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,再随机化通常提高功效,但极小效应下可能因推断更保守而降低功效;异质性对大小效应的功效影响相反。
阅读关注点
应核对功效所依赖的检验、显著性水平与平衡规则,以及效应异质性如何进入功效公式和实际样本量计算。
阅读边界
仅依据所给Crossref摘要;未说明具体功效公式及适用条件,不能把精度提升直接解释为所有情形下功效更高。

原文摘要

Summary Power analyses are an important aspect of experimental design, because they help determine how experiments are implemented in practice. It is common to specify a desired level of power and compute the sample size necessary to obtain that power. Such calculations are well known for completely randomized experiments, but there can be many benefits to using other experimental designs. For example, it has recently been established that rerandomization, where subjects are randomized until covariate balance is obtained, increases the precision of causal effect estimators. This work establishes the power of rerandomized treatment-control experiments, thereby allowing for sample size calculators. We find the surprising result that, while power is often greater under rerandomization than complete randomization, the opposite can occur for very small treatment effects. The reason is that inference under rerandomization can be relatively more conservative, in the sense that it can have a lower Type-I error at the same nominal significance level, and this additional conservativeness adversely affects power. This surprising result is due to treatment effect heterogeneity, a quantity often ignored in power analyses. We find that heterogeneity increases power for large effect sizes, but decreases power for small effect sizes.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文