Evaluating causes of effects by posterior effects of causes
用后验因果效应评估既有结果的成因AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究反事实概率、总效应与直接效应的识别;因果图本身不足以归入网络与干扰。
用后验因果效应评估既有结果的成因AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Summary For the case with a single causal variable, Dawid et al. (2014) defined the probability of causation, and Pearl (2000) defined the probability of necessity to assess the causes of effects. For a case with multiple causes that could affect each other, this paper defines the posterior total and direct causal effects based on the evidence observed for post-treatment variables, which could be viewed as measurements of causes of effects. Posterior causal effects involve the probabilities of counterfactual variables. Thus, as with the probability of causation, the probability of necessity and direct causal effects, the identifiability of posterior total and direct causal effects requires more assumptions than the identifiability of traditional causal effects conditional on pre-treatment variables. We present assumptions required for the identifiability of posterior causal effects and provide identification equations. Further, when the causal relationships between multiple causes and an endpoint can be depicted by causal networks, we can simplify both the required assumptions and the identification equations of the posterior total and direct causal effects. Finally, using numerical examples, we compare the posterior total and direct causal effects with other measures for evaluating the causes of effects and the population attributable risks.