跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于有限总体抽样与精确检验,未提供对应所列计量领域细分的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
John P. Wendell
Josef Schmee

分层有限总体比例的精确推断

研究问题
在分层抽样的有限总体中,如何对错误总数或比例进行检验并构造置信界,同时处理各层错误数形成的干扰参数?
方法与思路
作者在干扰参数的可行集合上最大化检验的 p 值,提出全局搜索方法,再反演检验获得置信界,并提供搜索初值的启发式规则。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该程序解决了总体错误数假设不能完全确定统计量分布的计算困难,在层数适中且错误较少的样本中表现尚可。
阅读关注点
阅读时应核对检验统计量、干扰参数可行集与全局最大值的搜索保证,并检查置信界覆盖性质及计算量随层数的变化。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;具体抽样条件、精确性证明及性能数值未提供,不能推断刊本变化或软件当前可用性。

原文摘要

Auditors and others often encounter finite populations with a dichotomous characteristic from which they draw stratified samples. In auditing the dichotomy arises when a population item is classified as either in error or in compliance with some rule or regulation. Usually the proportion of errors is small. The auditing objective may require calculation of a p value for the sample outcome relative to a hypothesis, or a confidence bound for the proportion or total number of errors in the population. In sampling from L strata with hypotheses concerning the total number of errors in the population, the calculation of p values is not straightforward. The complication arises because the parameter of the null hypothesis does not completely specify the distribution of the test statistic. This distribution depends on an (L − 1)-dimensional nuisance parameter consisting of the number of errors in each stratum. Because confidence bounds can be obtained by inverting the hypothesis test, the same difficulty applies to calculating confidence bounds. This article tests H 1 using the maximum p value over the feasible set of nuisance parameters. It describes a fairly efficient search method for finding a global maximum p value. Confidence bounds are calculated by inverting the hypothesis test. The article also presents an heuristic expression for determining good starting values in the search for confidence bounds. The procedures are implemented on a standard statistical package and are available from StatLib. They seem to perform reasonably well with samples from a moderate number of strata with a small number of errors.

笔记与分组