Nonparametric regression estimates using misclassified binary responses
使用误分类二元响应的非参数回归估计AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究误分类二元响应的通用回归估计,未明确涉及离散选择行为、因果识别或其他所列方向。
使用误分类二元响应的非参数回归估计AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
SUMMARY For random design nonparametric regression, in the case that the responses are binary and subject to misclassification, the performance of the kernel estimator is investigated. The kernel estimator is generally biased for the local proportion. To adjust for the bias, the double sampling scheme of Tenenbein (1970, 1971) is considered. A plugged-in kernel estimator and an imputed kernel estimator, which adjust for the effect of misclassification on the kernel estimator, are proposed, and their asymptotic mean squared errors are analysed. The plugged-in kernel estimator is better than the simple kernel estimator, which uses only the data without misclassification in the validation subsample, in the sense of having smaller asymptotic mean squared error. However, the imputed kernel estimator has smaller asymptotic variance. If the misclassification probabilities are constant, then the two proposed estimators have the same asymptotic bias. In this case, the imputed kernel estimator is always better than the plugged-in kernel estimator. For general misclassification probabilities, the asymptotic biases of the two proposed estimators are not comparable in magnitude. However, our simulation results demonstrate that, even when the misclassification probabilities are not constant, the imputed kernel estimator is still better for reasonable sample sizes.