跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要主要研究通用高维测量误差估计与多重检验,未明确涉及所列领域的具体模型或经济应用,分类证据不足。

反馈分类问题

Calibrated Equilibrium Estimation and Double Selection for High-dimensional Partially Linear Measurement Error Models

高维部分线性测量误差模型的校准均衡估计与双重选择

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jingxuan Luo
Gaorong Li
Heng Peng
Lili Yue

高维部分线性测量误差模型的校准均衡估计与双重选择

研究问题
在高维部分线性模型存在测量误差时,如何校正估计偏差、处理非凸目标的无下界问题,并控制变量发现的错误率?
方法与思路
作者提出 CARE 校准均衡估计,以自助法近似测量误差协方差,并构造 CARE–MUSE 多重双重选择算法控制错误发现率。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称给出估计与预测的预言不等式、错误符号数量界及非参数部分收敛率,并研究较弱最小信号条件下的发现率和功效。
阅读关注点
核对测量误差协方差所需信息、自助法有效性与非凸问题的处理,比较估计误差、符号一致性及多重检验保证的不同条件。
阅读边界
仅据所给 OpenAlex 摘要,未核对全文及刊本变化;正则条件、误差信息来源与算法细节未说明,无法判断具体数据中的识别可行性。

原文摘要

In practice, measurement error data is frequently encountered and needs to be handled appropriately. As a result of additional bias induced by measurement error, many existing estimation methods fail to achieve satisfactory performances. This paper studies high-dimensional partially linear measurement error models. It proposes a calibrated equilibrium (CARE) estimation method to calibrate the bias caused by measurement error and overcomes the technical difficulty of the objective function unbounded from below in high-dimensional cases due to non-convexity. To facilitate the applications of the CARE estimation method, a bootstrap approach for approximating the covariance matrix of measurement errors is introduced. For the high-dimensional or ultra-high dimensional partially linear measurement error models, a novel multiple testing method, the calibrated equilibrium multiple double selection (CARE–MUSE) algorithm, is proposed to control the false discovery rate (FDR). Under certain regularity conditions, we derive the oracle inequalities for estimation error and prediction risk, along with an upper bound on the number of falsely discovered signs for the CARE estimator. We further establish the convergence rate of the nonparametric function estimator. In addition, FDR and power guarantee for the CARE–MUSE algorithm are investigated under a weaker minimum signal condition, which is insufficient for the CARE estimator to achieve sign consistency. Extensive simulation studies and a real data application demonstrate the satisfactory finite sample performance of the proposed methods.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文