跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究未测混杂和结局依赖抽样下因果风险差的非参数界,直接对应因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Erin E. Gabriel
Michael C. Sachs
Arvid Sjölander

观察性研究中结局依赖抽样的因果效应界

研究问题
在抽样概率依赖结局、且存在未测混杂的观察性研究中,如何为二元暴露与二元结局的因果风险差构造非参数界?
方法与思路
作者针对六种结局依赖抽样情形推导因果风险差的界,并展示两种推导思路,以处理不能直接写成线性约束的界定问题。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称将因果效应界的研究从通常的随机抽样情形扩展到结局依赖抽样,并以维生素D浓度对死亡率的影响作实例说明。
阅读关注点
应核对六种抽样情形各自可用的信息、界的具体表达及是否具有锐性,以及两种推导方法如何处理非线性约束。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化;摘要未列出六种抽样设定,也未说明各界的锐性或实际宽度。

原文摘要

Outcome-dependent sampling designs are common in many different scientific fields including epidemiology, ecology, and economics. As with all observational studies, such designs often suffer from unmeasured confounding, which generally precludes the nonparametric identification of causal effects. Nonparametric bounds can provide a way to narrow the range of possible values for a nonidentifiable causal effect without making additional untestable assumptions. The nonparametric bounds literature has almost exclusively focused on settings with random sampling, and the bounds have often been derived with a particular linear programming method. We derive novel bounds for the causal risk difference, often referred to as the average treatment effect, in six settings with outcome-dependent sampling and unmeasured confounding for a binary outcome and exposure. Our derivations of the bounds illustrate two approaches that may be applicable in other settings where the bounding problem cannot be directly stated as a system of linear constraints. We illustrate our derived bounds in a real data example involving the effect of vitamin D concentration on mortality. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组