跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确讨论随机实验、中间变量、潜在值、主分层因果效应及识别假设。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Peng Ding
Jiannan Lu

基于主层评分的主分层分析

研究问题
处理与结果之间存在无法随机化的中间变量时,如何处理随机实验中的选择问题,并估计主层内的因果效应?
方法与思路
作者以中间变量的联合潜在值定义主层,利用给定协变量的主层概率构造加权样本,且构造过程不使用结果数据。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该方法无需对结果分布设定模型,并提出针对可忽略性与单调性违反的敏感性分析,辅以两个真实数据示例。
阅读关注点
应核对主层效应的定义、主层评分的识别与估计、加权后的可比性,以及敏感性分析如何刻画关键假设的违反。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要;稳健性仍依赖摘要提及的不可检验识别假设,其具体形式、适用范围和实例结果未说明。

原文摘要

Summary Practitioners are interested in not only the average causal effect of a treatment on the outcome but also the underlying causal mechanism in the presence of an intermediate variable between the treatment and outcome. However, in many cases we cannot randomize the intermediate variable, resulting in sample selection problems even in randomized experiments. Therefore, we view randomized experiments with intermediate variables as semiobservational studies. In parallel with the analysis of observational studies, we provide a theoretical foundation for conducting objective causal inference with an intermediate variable under the principal stratification framework, with principal strata defined as the joint potential values of the intermediate variable. Our strategy constructs weighted samples based on principal scores, defined as the conditional probabilities of the latent principal strata given covariates, without access to any outcome data. This principal stratification analysis yields robust causal inference without relying on any model assumptions on the outcome distributions. We also propose approaches to conducting sensitivity analysis for violations of the ignorability and monotonicity assumptions: the very crucial but untestable identification assumptions in our theory. When the assumptions required by the classical instrumental variable analysis cannot be justified by background knowledge or cannot be made because of scientific questions of interest, our strategy serves as a useful alternative tool to deal with intermediate variables. We illustrate our methodologies by using two real data examples and find scientifically meaningful conclusions.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文