Rank-Based Autoregressive Order Identification
基于秩的自回归阶数识别AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要明确研究 ARMA 模型、自回归阶数识别及时间序列异常值。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
关注这篇论文的作者
基于秩的自回归阶数识别
- 研究问题
- 创新密度未知，尤其存在厚尾、非对称分布或异常值时，基于秩的程序在自回归阶数识别中表现如何？
- 方法与思路
- 作者将针对 ARMA 参数线性限制的秩检验用于 AR 阶数识别，并与偏相关图和拉格朗日乘子方法比较有限样本表现。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要报告高斯情形表现相近，而在所考察的非高斯与异常值情形下秩方法的正确选阶比例更高，并研究其稳健性。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对秩检验如何转化为选阶程序、比较方法的设置、异常值生成机制，以及所称不受异常值影响的准确含义。
- 阅读边界
- 材料为稿件版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要；优势与稳健性是摘要陈述，具体设计及条件未说明，不能推广到任意污染情形。
原文摘要
Optimal rank-based procedures have been derived for testing arbitrary linear restrictions on the parameters of autoregressive moving average (ARMA) models with unspecified innovation densities. The finite-sample performances of these procedures are investigated here in the context of AR order identification and compared to those of classical (partial correlograms and Lagrange multipliers) methods. The results achieved by rank-based methods are quite comparable, in the Gaussian case, to those achieved by the traditional ones, which, under Gaussian assumptions, are asymptotically optimal. However, under non-Gaussian innovation densities, especially heavy-tailed or nonsymmetric, or when outliers are present, the percentages of correct order selection based on rank methods are strikingly better than those resulting from traditional approaches, even in the case of very short (n = 25) series. These empirical findings confirm the often ignored theoretical fact that the Gaussian case, in the ARMA context, is the least favorable one. The robustness properties of rank-based identification methods are also investigated; it is shown that, contrary to the robustified versions of their classical counterparts, the proposed rank-based methods are not affected, neither by the presence of innovation outliers nor by that of observation (additive) outliers.