跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要围绕观察研究中的协变量平衡加权、合成控制及因果效应估计展开。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Sicheng Lin
Meng Xu
Xi Zhang
Shih-Kang Chao
Ying-Kai Huang
Xiaolin Shi

面向大规模因果推断的协变量平衡方法

研究问题
在无法开展随机实验、观察数据规模很大的场景中,如何高效计算协变量平衡权重,并将其用于可扩展的因果影响评估?
方法与思路
作者为熵平衡和 MicroSynth 分别提出 DistEB、DistMS 求解算法,支持分布式计算,并结合合成控制构建因果影响估计系统。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,求解器具有线性时间复杂度,在最多百万受治单位、487个协变量的研究中考察规模效应,并报告样本扩大时偏差和方差下降。
阅读关注点
应核对线性复杂度对应的维度与精度要求、权重约束及收敛判据,以及大样本偏差下降依赖何种数据生成机制和识别条件。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审或期刊接收未获核实;摘要未说明完整识别条件及复杂度口径,样本扩大也不能据此保证消除混杂偏差。

原文摘要

With the modern software and online platforms to collect massive amount of data, there is an increasing demand of applying causal inference methods at large scale when randomized experimentation is not viable. Weighting methods that directly incorporate covariate balancing have recently gained popularity for estimating causal effects in observational studies. These methods reduce the manual efforts required by researchers to iterate between propensity score modeling and balance checking until a satisfied covariate balance result. However, conventional solvers for determining weights lack the scalability to apply such methods on large scale datasets in companies like Snap Inc. To address the limitations and improve computational efficiency, in this paper we present scalable algorithms, DistEB and DistMS, for two balancing approaches: entropy balancing and MicroSynth. The solvers have linear time complexity and can be conveniently implemented in distributed computing frameworks such as Spark, Hive, etc. We study the properties of balancing approaches at different scales up to 1 million treated units and 487 covariates. We find that with larger sample size, both bias and variance in the causal effect estimation are significantly reduced. The results emphasize the importance of applying balancing approaches on large scale datasets. We combine the balancing approach with a synthetic control framework and deploy an end-to-end system for causal impact estimation at Snap Inc.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文