跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦通用随机逼近和数值优化,没有明确的因果、时间序列、金融或其他所列细分研究对象。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Panos Toulis
Thibaut Horel
Edoardo M. Airoldi

近端 Robbins–Monro 方法

研究问题
如何为采用近端更新的随机逼近建立理论框架,改善经典 Robbins–Monro 程序的数值稳定性,同时维持已有收敛速率?
方法与思路
作者构造经典 Robbins–Monro 程序的近端版本并进行理论分析,再发展便于实现的近似程序,涵盖目标无法解析计算的情形。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,所提程序改善稳定性并保持已知最佳收敛速率;近似实现仍有稳定性优势,并扩展现有随机近端程序的适用范围。
阅读关注点
应核对稳定性与收敛速率的具体定义、步长和目标函数条件,以及近似更新的误差控制、计算成本与所谓几乎无权衡的依据。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,理论条件、近似精度和实验结果未说明;摘要中的优势陈述不能据此视为对所有优化问题的保证。

原文摘要

Abstract The need for statistical estimation with large data sets has reinvigorated interest in iterative procedures and stochastic optimization. Stochastic approximations are at the forefront of this recent development as they yield procedures that are simple, general and fast. However, standard stochastic approximations are often numerically unstable. Deterministic optimization, in contrast, increasingly uses proximal updates to achieve numerical stability in a principled manner. A theoretical gap has thus emerged. While standard stochastic approximations are subsumed by the framework Robbins and Monro (The annals of mathematical statistics, 1951, pp. 400–407), there is no such framework for stochastic approximations with proximal updates. In this paper, we conceptualize a proximal version of the classical Robbins–Monro procedure. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates that the proposed procedure has important stability benefits over the classical Robbins–Monro procedure, while it retains the best known convergence rates. Exact implementations of the proximal Robbins–Monro procedure are challenging, but we show that approximate implementations lead to procedures that are easy to implement, and still dominate standard procedures by achieving numerical stability, practically without trade-offs. Moreover, approximate proximal Robbins–Monro procedures can be applied even when the objective cannot be calculated analytically, and so they generalize stochastic proximal procedures currently in use.

笔记与分组