跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以倾向得分、结果模型和增广逆概率加权估计平均处理效应。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Jianqing Fan
Soham Jana
Sanjeev Kulkarni
Qishuo Yin

用于平均处理效应估计的因子辅助双重深度学习

研究问题
当协变量高维、强相关,并以稀疏非线性方式影响倾向得分和结果模型时,如何灵活估计平均处理效应并获得效率保证?
方法与思路
作者用因子增强神经网络 FAST-NN 分别学习结果函数与倾向得分,再代入增广逆概率加权框架,构造 FIDDLE 估计量。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称方法可选择相关变量并学习低维函数结构,在模型误设下保持 ATE 一致性,且在灵活模型族中达到半参数效率。
阅读关注点
应核对因果识别条件、因子与稀疏非线性结构、干扰函数收敛要求,以及模型误设下的一致性和效率结论的确切范围。
阅读边界
这是 arXiv 预印本,同行评审与期刊接收未核实;摘要未说明识别及速率条件,不能把模型误设下的一致性理解为任意误设均有效。

原文摘要

We investigate the problem of estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) under a very general setup where the covariates can be high-dimensional, highly correlated, and can have sparse nonlinear effects on the propensity and outcome models. We present the use of a Double Deep Learning strategy for estimation, which involves combining recently developed factor-augmented deep learning-based estimators, FAST-NN, for both the response functions and propensity scores to achieve our goal. By using FAST-NN, our method can select variables that contribute to propensity and outcome models in a completely nonparametric and algorithmic manner and adaptively learn low-dimensional function structures through neural networks. Our proposed novel estimator, FIDDLE (Factor Informed Double Deep Learning Estimator), estimates ATE based on the framework of augmented inverse propensity weighting AIPW with the FAST-NN-based response and propensity estimates. FIDDLE consistently estimates ATE even under model misspecification and is flexible to also allow for low-dimensional covariates. Our method achieves semiparametric efficiency under a very flexible family of propensity and outcome models. We present extensive numerical studies on synthetic and real datasets to support our theoretical guarantees and establish the advantages of our methods over other traditional choices, especially when the data dimension is large.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文