跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究空间自回归及相似性权重,未明确网络干扰、面板或时间序列结构,现有细分缺少直接对应项。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Francesca Rossi
Offer Lieberman

扩展参数空间与相似性权重下的空间自回归

研究问题
当空间自回归系数可以接近或等于一,且权重由数据相似性决定时,如何统一处理不同收敛速度和极限分布下的推断?
方法与思路
作者以随机标准化统一常规、单位根附近及中度积分情形,分析权重结构对应的极限理论,并使用平移后的剖面似然。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,论文给出扩展参数空间及数据驱动相似性权重下的渐近理论,区分标准与非标准极限,并以模拟和波士顿房价展示方法。
阅读关注点
应核对数据驱动权重的条件、随机标准化的具体定义,以及逆权重结构范数增长速度如何决定极限分布和推断形式。
阅读边界
仅据所给 RePEc 出版社摘要,不能还原各参数情形的完整条件;空间单位根与时间序列单位根的关系也需核对,版本变化未提供。

原文摘要

We provide in this paper asymptotic theory for a spatial autoregressive model (SAR, henceforth) in which the spatial coefficient, λ, is allowed to be less than or equal to unity, as well as consistent with a local to unit root (LUR) model and of the moderate integration (MI) from unity type, and the spatial weights are allowed to be similarity-based and data driven. Other special cases of our setting include the random walk, a model in which all the weights are equal, the standard SAR model in which λ<1 and the similarity based autoregression in which λ=1 and data do not display a natural order. As the norming rates for the asymptotic theory are very different in the λ<1 - compared with the λ=1 and LUR cases, we resort to random norming that treats all cases in a uniform manner. It turns out that standard CLT results prevail in a large class of models in which the infinity norm of the inverse of the weighting structure that characterizes the reduced-form process is Onγ , γ∈[0,1), and is non-standard in the case γ=1. We use a shifted profile likelihood to obtain results which are valid for all cases. A small simulation experiment supports our findings and the usefulness of our model is illustrated with an empirical application of the Boston housing data set in which the estimate of λ appeared to be very close to unity.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文