跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究一般重复测量实验的秩检验,未明确面板回归、因果识别或分位数效应等所列细分目标。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
G. L. Thompson
L. P. Ammann

重复测量设计中区组间秩统计量的效率

研究问题
重复测量设计中,仅使用区组内秩可能损失多少检验功效,跨区组排序如何改善检验,秩变换程序又存在哪些限制?
方法与思路
作者研究两向重复测量设计中的区组间秩统计量,涵盖处理效应、有序备择和多重比较,并推导部分检验的 Pitman 效率。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在较弱假设下得到有关效率结果,同时指出重复测量中秩变换的严重限制,强调其有效性与渐近分布依赖设计。
阅读关注点
应核对区组间排序与对齐的具体方式、重复测量的依赖结构,以及秩变换失效的设计和效率比较所用备择条件。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,版本未注明。摘要未列出全部有效或失效设计,也未给出小样本保证;不能据此推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

For factorial designs, tests that rely on the method of n rankings, for example, the Friedman test, suffer a potential loss of power since they depend only on within-block ranks. This deficiency is overcome by ranking across blocks as is done in the aligned rank tests and the rank transform procedures. This article examines a broad class of powerful interblock rank statistics for testing for both treatment effects and ordered alternatives and for performing multiple comparisons in a two-way repeated measures design. Pitman efficiencies are obtained for tests that closely resemble the rank transform test and for aligned rank tests under weaker hypotheses than assumed by Puri and Sen (1971). In addition, several serious limitations of the rank transform procedure for repeated measures designs are presented. Limitations of the rank transform procedures, in particular, merit such study because they are recommended without reservation by the SAS manual for use with PROC ANOVA and PROC GLM and are very easy to implement. As a result, they are used, often indiscriminately, for both hypothesis testing and estimation by professionals and researchers in such diverse fields as clinical psychology and data processing services. Yet, little is known about their asymptotic (much less small-sample) properties except for a few designs. Whereas in some instances it has been demonstrated that the rank transform is an appropriate test with good power properties, it has been demonstrated in equally many instances that it is not a valid procedure and does not have the expected asymptotic distribution.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文