跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论删失样本中的通用两样本检验,未涉及所列因果、经济分布效应或金融风险方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Edmund A. Gehan
Donald G. Thomas

有删失与无删失小样本中若干两样本检验的表现

研究问题
在指数与不同 Weibull 分布的小样本中,删失是否存在及删失时间是否相同,会如何影响三种两样本检验的水平和功效?
方法与思路
作者用 Monte Carlo 方法比较 F 比率、修正 F 比率及广义 Wilcoxon 检验,在两种样本规模和不同删失设定下获得功效曲线。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称检验表现依赖分布与删失方式,指出 F 检验在 Weibull 情形下不稳健,且删失时间不同时修正 F 检验不适用。
阅读关注点
应核对 Weibull 参数、删失生成机制与检验水平,区分功效较高与水平正确,并查看不同设定下的完整比较曲线。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;具体分布参数、删失比例及功效曲线未提供,不能推广为普遍的检验优劣排序。

原文摘要

The power curves of three two-sample tests are compared in small samples from the exponential and four forms of the Weibull distribution with and without censoring. The tests considered are: F ratio, modified F ratio (F′ test), and a generalized Wilcoxon test (W test). Monte Carlo methods are used to obtain power curves for each test with sample sizes 20 and 50. The F test is known to be most efficient when sampling is from exponential distributions. If sampling is from exponential distributions and either there are no censored observations or all censored observations equal T, the F′ and W tests are nearly as powerful as F, with F′ being more powerful than W. If the times to censoring are not equal, the F′ test is not appropriate and the W test is nearly as powerful as F. When sampling is from Weibull distributions, with or without censoring, the F test is not robust; for example, its size is too small when the coefficient of variation is less than one. When sampling is from Weibull distributions and either there is no censoring or all censored observations have the same value, the F′ test is more powerful than the W test. If the times to censoring are not equal, the F′ test is not appropriate; the W test has the proper size and is a valid test.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文