跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究高斯条件依赖图的统计推断,图结构本身不足以归为经济网络或干扰研究。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Lili Zheng
Genevera I. Allen

不规则测量数据下的高斯图模型推断

研究问题
当不同节点对的共同观测数量差异很大时,如何在高斯图模型中体现各条边的不同不确定性,并开展逐边推断与错误发现率控制?
方法与思路
作者提出 GI-JOE,通过局部逐边分析及图内依赖分解构造推断,使各边方差反映相应邻居的样本量,并配套 FDR 控制。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称证明了不规则测量条件下的统计有效性,突破仅用最小成对样本量描述表现的局限,并以模拟及神经科学数据展示方法。
阅读关注点
应核对不规则观测机制、局部样本量如何进入方差、图结构及高维条件,以及逐边检验依赖如何影响 FDR 控制。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化;摘要未说明任意缺失机制下是否有效,也未给具体条件与比较数值。

原文摘要

In this article, we investigate the Gaussian graphical model inference problem in a novel setting that we call erose measurements, referring to irregularly measured or observed data. For graphs, this results in different node pairs having vastly different sample sizes which frequently arises in data integration, genomics, neuroscience, and sensor networks. Existing works characterize the graph selection performance using the minimum pairwise sample size, which provides little insights for erosely measured data, and no existing inference method is applicable. We aim to fill in this gap by proposing the first inference method that characterizes the different uncertainty levels over the graph caused by the erose measurements, named GI-JOE (Graph Inference when Joint Observations are Erose). Specifically, we develop an edge-wise inference method and an affiliated FDR control procedure, where the variance of each edge depends on the sample sizes associated with corresponding neighbors. We prove statistical validity under erose measurements, thanks to careful localized edge-wise analysis and disentangling the dependencies across the graph. Finally, through simulation studies and a real neuroscience data example, we demonstrate the advantages of our inference methods for graph selection from erosely measured data. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文