跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用先验检查并应用于医学诊断系统,未提供所列经济计量细分领域的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Nomi L. Harris
Kate Bull

频率先验信念的实证检验:方法与先天性心脏病案例

研究问题
随着离散变量样本陆续获得,如何检查专家给出的先验概率是否与数据相容,并及时识别需要修正的主观输入?
方法与思路
作者比较非序贯与序贯形式的Bayes因子和显著性检验,从观测数据预测概率的对数出发,构造用于折减专家判断的差异统计量。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称两类比较方法具有共同的标准化基础;案例中的专家判断总体质量较高,作者据此建议建立自动监测与调整程序。
阅读关注点
应核对先验与数据比较统计量的定义、序贯监测规则、专家判断折减方式,以及案例评价标准和自动调整的实施条件。
阅读边界
所给OpenAlex索引摘要未注明稿件版本。摘要未提供判断质量的数值标准、序贯误差控制或调整细节,案例结论不能推广至所有专家系统。

原文摘要

We consider the problem of critiquing prior beliefs concerning the distribution of a discrete random variable in the light of a sequentially obtained sample. A topical application concerns a probabilistic expert system for the diagnosis of congenital heart disease, which requires specification of a large number of conditional probabilities that are initially imprecisely estimated by a suitable “expert.” These prior beliefs may be formally updated as data become available, but it would seem essential to contrast the original expert assessments with the data obtained to quickly identify inappropriate subjective inputs. We consider both Bayes factor and significance testing techniques for such a prior/data comparison, both in nonsequential and sequential forms. The common basis as alternative standardizations of the logarithm of the predictive ordinate of the observed data is emphasised, and a Bayesian discrepancy statistic with a variety of interpretations provides a formal means of discounting the expert's judgments in the light of the data. The judgments are found to be of generally high quality, and procedures for automatic monitoring and adaptation are recommended.

笔记与分组