跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要虽使用时间依赖模型,但对象是生物基因表达,未提供宏观时间序列或其他所列细分的直接依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Ming Yuan

多种生物条件下微阵列时间序列数据的隐马尔可夫模型

研究问题
在多种生物条件的微阵列时间进程实验中,如何利用时间依赖识别差异表达基因,并按其随时间变化的表达模式分类?
方法与思路
作者提出隐马尔可夫建模方法,联合利用各时点的依赖信息识别差异表达与时间模式,并与逐时点边际分析进行比较。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,模拟中敏感度明显提高而错误发现率仅小幅增加;心脏组织衰老与应激反应案例中也识别出更多基因。
阅读关注点
应核对隐状态含义、转移与观测模型、基因分类规则,以及敏感度和错误发现率的评价方式、模拟设定与案例验证依据。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;摘要未提供模型细节和比较数值,识别基因更多本身不足以证明发现均为真实。

原文摘要

Among the first microarray experiments were those measuring expression over time, and time course experiments remain common. Most methods to analyze time course data attempt to group genes sharing similar temporal profiles within a single biological condition. However, with time course data in multiple conditions, a main goal is to identify differential expression patterns over time. An intuitive approach to this problem would be to apply at each time point any of the many methods for identifying differentially expressed genes across biological conditions and then somehow combine the results of the repeated marginal analyses. But considering each time point in isolation is inefficient, because it does not use the information contained in the dependence structure of the time course data. This problem is exacerbated in microarray studies, where low sensitivity is a problematic feature of many methods. Furthermore, a gene's expression pattern over time might not be identified by simply combining results from repeated marginal analyses. We propose a hidden Markov modeling approach developed to efficiently identify differentially expressed genes in time course microarray experiments and classify genes based on their temporal expression patterns. Simulation studies demonstrate a substantial increase in sensitivity, with little increase in the false discovery rate, compared with a marginal analysis at each time point. This increase is also observed in data from a case study of the effects of aging on stress response in heart tissue, where a significantly larger number of genes are identified using the proposed approach.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文