跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究有序变量的一般条件关联检验,没有经济选择机制或处理效应目标,不能仅凭有序模型归入离散选择或因果推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Chun Li
Bryan E. Shepherd

调整协变量后的两个有序变量关联检验

研究问题
如何在调整连续或分类协变量后检验两个有序变量的关联,并对称处理二者,避免预先指定哪一个是结果变量?
方法与思路
作者分别拟合两个有序变量对协变量的多项模型,再比较零假设下预期联合分布与观察分布,或检验新定义残差的相关性。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要提出两类对称检验及有序结果的个体残差,给出经验或渐近 p 值计算方法,并报告模拟中的功效与第一类错误率表现。
阅读关注点
读全文应核对条件模型正确设定的重要性、残差定义与条件独立零假设的关系,以及 p 值计算和比较模型的设定。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;模型错设下的性质和检验数值未说明,调整后的关联也不能据此解释为因果关系。

原文摘要

We propose a new set of test statistics to examine the association between two ordinal categorical variables X and Y after adjusting for continuous and/or categorical covariates Z. Our approach first fits multinomial (e.g., proportional odds) models of X and Y, separately, on Z. For each subject, we then compute the conditional distributions of X and Y given Z. If there is no relationship between X and Y after adjusting for Z, then these conditional distributions will be independent, and the observed value of (X, Y) for a subject is expected to follow the product distribution of these conditional distributions. We consider two simple ways of testing the null of conditional independence, both of which treat X and Y equally, in the sense that they do not require specifying an outcome and a predictor variable. The first approach adds these product distributions across all subjects to obtain the expected distribution of (X, Y) under the null and then contrasts it with the observed unconditional distribution of (X, Y). Our second approach computes "residuals" from the two multinomial models and then tests for correlation between these residuals; we define a new individual-level residual for models with ordinal outcomes. We present methods for computing p-values using either the empirical or asymptotic distributions of our test statistics. Through simulations, we demonstrate that our test statistics perform well in terms of power and Type I error rate when compared to proportional odds models which treat X as either a continuous or categorical predictor. We apply our methods to data from a study of visual impairment in children and to a study of cervical abnormalities in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected women. Supplemental materials for the article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文