Modeling Partial Compliance Through Copulas in a Principal Stratification Framework
主分层框架下用Copula建模部分依从性AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确在主分层因果推断框架中处理部分依从性并估计治疗效应。
主分层框架下用Copula建模部分依从性AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Within the principal stratification framework for causal inference, modeling partial compliance is challenging because the continuous nature of the principal strata raises subtle specification issues. In this context, we propose an approach based on the assumption that the joint distribution of the degree of compliance to the treatment and the degree of compliance to the control follows a Plackett copula, so that their association is modeled in a flexible way through a single parameter. Moreover, given the two compliances, the distribution of the outcomes is parameterized in a flexible way through a regression model which may include interaction and quadratic terms and may also be heteroscedastic. In order to estimate the parameters of the resulting model, and then the causal effect of the treatment, we adopt a maximum likelihood approach via the EM algorithm. In applying this approach, the marginal distributions of the two compliances are estimated by their empirical distribution functions, so that no constraints are posed on these distributions. Since the two compliances cannot be jointly observed, there is not direct empirical support for the association parameter. We describe a strategy for studying this parameter by a profile likelihood method and discuss an analysis of the sensitivity of the causal inference results to its value. We apply the proposed approach to data from a study about a drug for lowering cholesterol levels previously analyzed by Efron and Feldman and by Jin and Rubin. Estimated causal effects are in line with those of previous analyses, but the pattern of association between the compliances is qualitatively different, apparently due to the flexibility of the copula and to allowing regression equations in the proposed method to include interactions and heteroscedasticity.