跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究匹配观察性研究的因果推断、倾向得分调整与敏感性分析。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Samuel D Pimentel
Yaxuan Huang

匹配设计中的协变量自适应随机化推断

研究问题
在匹配观察性研究中,若匹配组内倾向得分仍有差异,如何修正均匀随机分配假设所导致的推断偏差?
方法与思路
作者按估计的组内倾向得分差异调整置换概率,无需剔除匹配对或建立结果变量模型,并将敏感性分析扩展到该推断框架。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称倾向得分估计样本足够大时,第一类错误可任意接近名义水平,并刻画恒定加性效应下均值差检验的大样本行为。
阅读关注点
应核对倾向得分估计与随机化检验的条件、误差控制的极限含义、恒定加性效应假设,以及敏感性分析如何处理未观测混杂。
阅读边界
仅据 Crossref 所载摘要;完整因果识别条件、倾向得分估计要求及有限样本误差未说明,不能声称可消除未观测混杂。

原文摘要

Abstract It is common to conduct causal inference in matched observational studies by proceeding as though treatment assignments within matched sets are assigned uniformly at random and using this distribution as the basis for inference. This approach ignores observed discrepancies in matched sets that may be consequential for the distribution of treatment, which are succinctly captured by within-set differences in the propensity score. We address this problem via covariate-adaptive randomization inference, which modifies the permutation probabilities to vary with estimated propensity score discrepancies and avoids requirements to exclude matched pairs or model an outcome variable. We show that the test achieves type I error control arbitrarily close to the nominal level when large samples are available for propensity score estimation. We characterize the large-sample behaviour of the new randomization test for a difference-in-means estimator of a constant additive effect. We also show that existing methods of sensitivity analysis generalize effectively to covariate-adaptive randomization inference. Finally, we evaluate the empirical value of combining matching and covariate-adaptive randomization procedures using simulations and analyses of genetic damage among welders and right-heart catheterization in surgical patients.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文