A Note on Optimal Estimation From a Risk-Management Perspective Under Possibly Misspecified Tail Behavior
尾部行为可能误设时风险管理视角下的最优估计AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以厚尾误设对投资组合 VaR 的影响为核心,并按下行风险度量误差比较估计方法,直接对应尾部风险。
尾部行为可能误设时风险管理视角下的最优估计AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Many financial time series show leptokurtic behavior--that is, fat tails. Such tail behavior is important for risk management. In this article I focus on the calculation of Value-at-Risk (VaR) as a downside-risk measure for optimal asset portfolios. Using a framework centered on the Student-t distribution, I explicitly allow for a discrepancy between the fat-tailedness of the true distribution of asset returns and that of the distribution used by the investment manager. As a result, numbers for the overestimation or underestimation of the true VaR of a given portfolio can be computed. These numbers are used to rank several well-known estimation methods for determining the unknown parameters of the distribution of asset returns. Minimizing the absolute (percentage) mismatch between the nominal and actual or true VaR leads to the choice of a Gaussian maximum quasi-likelihood estimator--that is, a least squares type of estimator. The maximum likelihood estimator has less satisfactory behavior. Outlier-robust estimators perform even worse if the required confidence level for the VaR is high. An explanation for these results is provided.