Simultaneous confidence intervals uniformly more likely to determine signs
更易判定符号的同时置信区间AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要提出通用的多参数同时区间与符号推断方法,未限定因果效应、分布效应或金融参数,无法据此选择具体领域标签。
更易判定符号的同时置信区间AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Many studies draw inferences about multiple endpoints but ignore the statistical implications of multiplicity. Effects inferred to be positive when there is no adjustment for multiplicity can lose their statistical significance when multiplicity is taken into account, perhaps explaining why such adjustments are so often omitted. We develop new simultaneous confidence intervals that mitigate this problem; these are uniformly more likely to determine signs than are standard simultaneous confidence intervals. When one or more of the parameter estimates are small, the new intervals sacrifice some length to avoid crossing zero; but when all the parameter estimates are large, the new intervals coincide with standard simultaneous confidence intervals, so there is no loss of precision. When only a small fraction of the estimates are small, the procedure can determine signs essentially as well as one-sided tests with prespecified directions, incurring only a modest penalty in maximum length. The intervals are constructed by inverting level-α tests to form a 1−α confidence set, and then projecting that set onto the coordinate axes to get confidence intervals. The tests have hyper-rectangular acceptance regions that minimize the maximum amount by which the acceptance region protrudes from the orthant that contains the hypothesized parameter value, subject to a constraint on the maximum side-length of the hyper-rectangle.