Model Robustness for Simultaneous Confidence Bands
同时置信带对模型误设的稳健性AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要研究通用回归置信带对二次模型误设的稳健性，没有足够依据对应所列经济计量细分。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
关注这篇论文的作者
同时置信带对模型误设的稳健性
- 研究问题
- 真实回归关系含二次曲率而拟合简单线性模型时，不同同时置信带能否维持整体覆盖，以及保留多少预测变量区间的覆盖？
- 方法与思路
- 作者限定预测变量的研究区间，逐步增加真实二次模型的曲率，比较多类置信带的实际覆盖概率与失去整体覆盖后的轴区间覆盖比例。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称，固定宽度与分段线性置信带较能保持覆盖；固定宽度带在较短约束区间及部分覆盖指标上表现有利，可能与其较宽形状有关。
- 阅读关注点
- 核对置信带构造、区间长度和曲率范围，区分整体覆盖与局部覆盖，并检查较好稳健性是否主要来自更宽的带。
- 阅读边界
- 仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要，稿件版本未注明，刊本差异未核验；方法名称含疑似提取乱码，需查原 PDF，比较结论限于所设二次误设。
原文摘要
Confidence bands for the simple linear model are examined to assess their degrees of robustness to departures from the model. All calculations are made under an interval constraint on the range of interest for the predictor variable. The true model is taken to be a quadratic polynomial, and departure from the linear case is considered in terms of increasing magnitude of a curvature parameter. Proposed measures of robustness include the actual coverage probability under the true model and a measure of percentage coverage over the predictor variable axis when the band fails to cover the true quadratic model. The different band functions considered include hyperbolic bands constructed from Scheffd's 5 method, linear-segmented bands, and fixed-width (minimax) and minimax-regret bands. In terms of preserving coverage probability under quadratic mis-specification, the fixed-width and linear-segment bands perform best, the former being preferred when the constraint interval on the predictor variable is small. When coverage is lost over some portion of the constraint interval, the fixed-width bands are also shown to preserve the greatest percentage of covered (predictor) axis values. The favorable performance of the fixed-width bands may be due to their generally wider, more rigid shape, relative to more curvilinear competitors. This may allow the bands to retain more extreme quadratic misspecifications than other bands.