Approximate Power for Repeated-Measures ANOVA Lacking Sphericity
非球形协方差下重复测量方差分析的近似功效AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要属于重复测量检验的通用统计方法,未提供面板经济模型或其他所列细分方向的直接证据。
反馈分类问题非球形协方差下重复测量方差分析的近似功效AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Violation of sphericity of covariance across repeated measures inflates Type I error rates in univariate repeated-measures analysis of variance. Hence the use of Geisser—Greenhouse or Huynh—Feldt is now common (to provide improved Type I error rate). With nonsphericity, no method has been available to compute power. A convenient method is suggested for approximating power and test size under nonsphericity. New approximations are suggested for (a) a weighted sum of independent noncentral χ2,s, (b) the trace of a noncentral Wishart (or pseudo-Wishart) matrix, (c) the expected values of and , and (d) the noncentral test statistic, whether corrected or uncorrected. The new approximations are extensions of the work of Box (1954a,b) and Satterthwaite (1941). The method performed well when evaluated against published and new simulations.