跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究通用密度形状约束与置信包络,未明确涉及所列经济计量细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Philip B. Stark

形状约束密度的有限样本置信包络

研究问题
当密度相对于正权重函数单调或至多具有若干众数时,如何构造保守的有限样本同时置信包络,并推断支撑集与众数?
方法与思路
作者将形状约束与经验分布函数差值形成的置信集合结合,通过有限个有限维线性规划求逐点上下界,再按形状约束外推。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该方法提供有限样本保守包络,并在特定光滑性条件下达到最优收缩速率,还可用于众数和支撑集推断。
阅读关注点
应核对置信集合的覆盖论证、线性规划维数界、带宽选择,以及众数邻域与支撑集内部条件如何限制收缩速率结论。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;有限样本保守性与速率均有条件,摘要不足以判断实际宽度或刊本变化。

原文摘要

A conservative finite-sample simultaneous confidence envelope for a density can be found by solving a finite set of finite-dimensional linear programming problems if the density is known to be monotonic or to have at most $k$ modes relative to a positive weight function. The dimension of the problems is at most $(n/\log n)^{1/3}$, where $n$ is the number of observations. The linear programs find densities attaining the largest and smallest values at a point among cumulative distribution functions in a confidence set defined using the assumed shape restriction and differences between the empirical cumulative distribution function evaluated at a subset of the observed points. Bounds at any finite set of points can be extrapolated conservatively using the shape restriction. The optima are attained by densities piecewise proportional to the weight function with discontinuities at a subset of the observations and at most five other points. If the weight function is constant and the density satisfies a local Lipschitz condition with exponent $\varrho$, the width of the bounds converges to zero at the optimal rate $(\log n/n)^{\varrho/(1+2\varrho)}$ outside every neighborhood of the set of modes, if a "bandwidth" parameter is chosen correctly. The integrated width of the bounds converges at the same rate on intervals where the density satisfies a Lipschitz condition if the intervals are strictly within the support of the density. The approach also gives algorithms to compute confidence intervals for the support of monotonic densities and for the mode of unimodal densities, lower confidence intervals on the number of modes of a distribution and conservative tests of the hypothesis of $k$-modality. We use the method to compute confidence bounds for the probability density of aftershocks of the 1984 Morgan Hill, CA, earthquake, assuming aftershock times are an inhomogeneous Poisson point process with decreasing intensity.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文