跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确分析跨时期相关观测、高度不平衡面板数据,并将方法应用于真实面板样本。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Savas Papadopoulos
Yasuo Amemiya

含固定与非正态潜变量的相关样本分析

研究问题
当面板数据的不同样本彼此相关、潜变量非正态且数据高度不平衡时,能否仍利用主要基于一阶和二阶矩的经典方法进行有效推断?
方法与思路
作者对相关样本拟合一般结构方程模型,采用在独立正态情形下正确的部分似然,分析主要参数的标准误与整体拟合指标,并提供稳健标准误。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称在所研究条件下,主要参数的渐近标准误与拟合指标同标准独立正态设定一致;模拟和真实面板例子进一步考察误差估计及相关性的影响。
阅读关注点
应核对哪些参数适用标准误不变结论、固定与随机潜变量分别需要什么条件,以及部分似然如何处理不平衡数据和跨时期相关。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;适用条件与参数范围未说明,模拟中效率损失较小不意味着可普遍忽略样本相关,也不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

A general structural equation model is fitted on a panel data set that consists of I correlated samples. The correlated samples could be data from correlated populations or correlated observations from occasions of panel data. We consider cases in which the full pseudo-normal likelihood cannot be used, for example, in highly unbalanced data where the participating individuals do not appear in consecutive years. The model is estimated by a partial likelihood that would be the full and correct likelihood for independent and normal samples. It is proved that the asymptotic standard errors (a.s.e.’s) for the most important parameters and an overall-fit measure are the same as the corresponding ones derived under the standard assumptions of normality and independence for all the observations. These results are very important since they allow us to apply classical statistical methods for inference, which use only first- and second-order moments, to correlated and nonnormal data. Via a simulation study we show that the a.s.e.’s based on the first two moments have negligible bias and provide less variability than the a.s.e.’s computed by an alternative robust estimator that utilizes up to fourth moments. Our methodology and results are applied to real panel data, and it is shown that the correlated samples cannot be formulated and analyzed as independent samples. We also provide robust a.s.e.’s for the remaining parameters. Additionally, we show in the simulation that the efficiency loss for not considering the correlation over the samples is small and negligible in the cases with random and fixed variables.

笔记与分组