跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:极值分布与删失估计属于一般统计方法,摘要没有金融尾部或系统性风险应用的依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
H. Leon Harter
Albert H. Moore

双端删失样本下第一类极值渐近分布参数的最大似然估计

研究问题
当极值分布样本的最低端与最高端观测被删失时,如何估计位置和尺度参数,并评估估计量的渐近与小样本表现?
方法与思路
作者推导删失似然及其导数,用迭代求解似然方程,通过信息矩阵获得渐近协方差,并以蒙特卡洛样本作比较。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称提供了参数迭代估计程序和不同删失比例下的渐近协方差表,并比较模拟结果及部分单端删失下的替代估计量。
阅读关注点
应核对双端删失机制、迭代算法的收敛与初始化、渐近计算条件,以及模拟中的偏差和均方误差如何随样本规模变化。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明;虽列明模拟规模,但未提供比较数值,不能判断最大似然估计是否普遍更优。

原文摘要

Let X be a random variable having the first asymptotic distribution of smallest (largest) values, with location parameter u and scale parameter b, b > 0. The natural logarithm of the likelihood function of a sample of size n from such a distribution, the lowest r1 and the highest r2 sample values having been censored, is written down and its first and second partial derivatives with respect to the parameters are worked out. The likelihood equations, obtained by equating to zero the first partial derivatives, do not have explicit solutions, but an iterative procedure for solving them on an electronic computer is described. The asymptotic variances and covariances of the maximum-likelihood estimators of the parameters are obtained by inverting the information matrix, whose elements are the negatives of the limits, as n → ∞, of the expected values of the second partial derivatives, and tabulated for censoring proportions q1 = 0.0(0.1)0.9 from below and q2 = 0.0(0.1) (0.9 – q1) from above. The asymptotic variances and covariances are compared with corresponding sample values obtained from a Monte Carlo study of 2000 samples each of sizes n = 10 and n = 20 from the distribution of smallest values. For single censoring from above, the mean square errors of the sample estimates are also compared with the variances of the best linear unbiased estimators and the mean square errors of the best linear invariant estimators.

笔记与分组