Panel quantile regression for extreme risk
面向极端风险的面板分位数回归AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接结合面板分位数回归、极值理论与极端风险预测。
面向极端风险的面板分位数回归AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Panel quantile regression models play an essential role in finance, insurance, and risk management applications. However, a direct application of panel regression for extreme conditional quantiles may suffer from a significant estimation uncertainty due to data sparsity on the far tail. We introduce a two-stage method to predict extreme conditional quantiles over cross-sections, which uses panel quantile regression at a selected intermediate level and then extrapolates the intermediate level to an extreme level with extreme value theory. This combination of panel quantile regression at an intermediate level and extreme value theory relies on a set of second-order conditions for heteroscedastic extremes. A metric called Average Absolute Relative Error is proposed to evaluate the prediction performance of both intermediate and extreme conditional quantiles. Allowing individual fixed effects in panel quantile regressions challenges the asymptotic analysis of the two-stage method and prediction metric. We demonstrate the finite sample performance of the extreme conditional quantile prediction compared to the direct use of panel quantile regression. Finally, an application of the two-stage method to the macroeconomic and housing price data finds strong evidence of housing bubbles and common economic factors.