Efficient Matrix Sampling Instruments for Correlated Latent Traits: Examples from the National Assessment of Educational Progress
相关潜在特质的高效矩阵抽样测量工具:美国教育进展评估实例AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要主要研究教育测量与调查题目分配,估计潜在能力分布不足以归入分位数与分布效应。
反馈分类问题相关潜在特质的高效矩阵抽样测量工具:美国教育进展评估实例AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
We study the efficiency of administering different subsets of a large collection of items in a sample survey to different people to estimate the distribution of several correlated traits. The designs are motivated by examples from the National Assessment of Educational Progress, an ongoing survey of U.S. students in the fourth, eighth, and twelfth grades. In this survey the traits represent proficiency in different subjects. For example, the Mathematics assessment estimates proficiency with Numbers and Operations, Measurement, and several other traits. Time constraints and concerns about student motivation limit the number of items that can be administered to a small subset of the items defining each trait. We find that effective matrix designs assign some items to measure each trait, even if the resulting number of items assigned to each trait must be small. Efficient allocations of items are ones that produce measurement error variances for a given trait that are similar for each sampled student. These allocations can be substantially better than designs that split the sample and measure traits on different subsets of students. Our results are consistent with recent research on efficient survey instrument design, but lead to substantially different recommendations due to the errors in the measurement of the traits.