Multinational Enforcement of Labor Law: Experimental Evidence on Strengthening Occupational Safety and Health Committees
跨国执行劳动法：强化职业安全与健康委员会的实验证据AI 解读 ↓
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明
本页整理公开书目信息，不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成，未完成全文核验，可能有误；具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本，未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要；缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录，不合计多个记录；关联记录可能包含正式发表版本，不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零，引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配，同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列，再参考通用方法与发表日期。
分类依据与纠错
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类：摘要明确通过工厂层面随机现场实验研究委员会对工人与工厂的因果效果。
反馈分类问题
正在核对关联版本…
代码、数据与补充材料
正在核对对应版本的资源…
关注这篇论文的作者
跨国执行劳动法：强化职业安全与健康委员会的实验证据
- 研究问题
- 跨国买家强化供应商职业安全与健康委员会的法定要求，能否改善工厂安全与工人处境，效果是否随内部管理能力而变化？
- 方法与思路
- 作者与 29 家跨国服装买家合作，在孟加拉国 84 家供应商工厂开展近一年现场实验，随机对一半工厂强化委员会规定的执行。
- 材料陈述的贡献
- 摘要称干预提高合规，较强委员会对客观安全有小幅正效应；效果集中于管理较好的工厂，管理较差工厂工人满意度下降。
- 阅读关注点
- 应核对随机执行干预与委员会强度效应的识别关系、安全指标和统计不确定性，以及管理异质性分析和无成本结论的证据。
- 阅读边界
- 仅依据所给 Crossref 摘要。摘要未提供估计规格、置信区间或识别委员会强度效应的条件，不能将未见工资等成本解释为普遍无成本。
原文摘要
Annually, work‐related mortality is responsible for 5–7% of all global deaths, and at least 1‐in‐9 workers experience nonfatal occupational accidents (ILO (2019a,b)). Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) committees are considered the key worker voice institution through which to improve workplace safety and health (ILO (1981)). I present evidence of OSH committees' causal effects on workers and on factories. To do so, I collaborated with 29 multinational apparel buyers that committed to enforce a local mandate for OSH committees on their suppliers in Bangladesh. With the buyers, I implemented a nearly year‐long field experiment with 84 supplier factories, randomly enforcing the mandate on half. The buyers' intervention increased compliance with the OSH committee law. Exploiting the experimental variation in OSH committees' strength, I find that stronger OSH committees had small, positive effects on objective measures of safety. These improvements did not come at a cost to workers in terms of wages or employment or to factories in terms of labor productivity. The effects on compliance, safety, and voice were largest for factories with better managerial practices. Factories with worse practices did not improve, and workers in these factories reported lower job satisfaction; this finding suggests complementarity between external enforcement and internal capacity in determining the efficacy of regulation.