Searching for a trail of evidence in a maze
在迷宫中搜寻证据路径AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以有向图上的未知路径信号检测为核心,直接涉及网络结构上的统计推断。
在迷宫中搜寻证据路径AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Consider a graph with a set of vertices and oriented edges connecting pairs of vertices. Each vertex is associated with a random variable and these are assumed to be independent. In this setting, suppose we wish to solve the following hypothesis testing problem: under the null, the random variables have common distribution N(0, 1) while under the alternative, there is an unknown path along which random variables have distribution N(μ, 1), μ> 0, and distribution N(0, 1) away from it. For which values of the mean shift μ can one reliably detect and for which values is this impossible? Consider, for example, the usual regular lattice with vertices of the form {(i, j) : 0≤i, −i≤j≤i and j has the parity of i} and oriented edges (i, j)→(i+1, j+s), where s=±1. We show that for paths of length m starting at the origin, the hypotheses become distinguishable (in a minimax sense) if $\mu_{m}\gg1/\sqrt{\log m}$, while they are not if μm≪1/log m. We derive equivalent results in a Bayesian setting where one assumes that all paths are equally likely; there, the asymptotic threshold is μm≈m−1/4. We obtain corresponding results for trees (where the threshold is of order 1 and independent of the size of the tree), for distributions other than the Gaussian and for other graphs. The concept of the predictability profile, first introduced by Benjamini, Pemantle and Peres, plays a crucial role in our analysis.