ON THE POWER PROPERTIES OF INFERENCE FOR PARAMETERS WITH INTERVAL IDENTIFIED SETS
区间识别集参数推断的功效性质AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要核心是通用区间部分识别推断,处理效应仅作为应用背景,不足以确定特定领域细分。
区间识别集参数推断的功效性质AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This article studies the power properties of confidence intervals (CIs) for a partially-identified parameter of interest with an interval identified set. We assume that the researcher has bounds estimators needed to construct the CIs proposed by Imbens and Manski (2004), Stoye (2009), and Stoye (2020), denoted by C I α 1 $CI_{\alpha }^{1}$ upper C upper I Subscript alpha Superscript 1 , C I α 2 $CI_{\alpha }^{2}$ upper C upper I Subscript alpha Superscript 2 , C I α 3 $CI_{\alpha }^{3}$ upper C upper I Subscript alpha Superscript 3 , and C I α 4 $CI_{\alpha }^{4}$ upper C upper I Subscript alpha Superscript 4 . We also assume that these bounds estimators are “ordered”: the lower bound estimator is less than or equal to the upper bound estimator. This setup arises in economic applications involving missing data and treatment effects. Under these conditions, we establish two results. First, we show that C I α 1 $CI_{\alpha }^{1}$ upper C upper I Subscript alpha Superscript 1 and C I α 2 $CI_{\alpha }^{2}$ upper C upper I Subscript alpha Superscript 2 are equally powerful, and both dominate C I α 3 $CI_{\alpha }^{3}$ upper C upper I Subscript alpha Superscript 3 and C I α 4 $CI_{\alpha }^{4}$ upper C upper I Subscript alpha Superscript 4 . Second, we consider a favorable situation in which there are two possible bounds estimators to construct these CIs, and one is more efficient than the other. One would expect that the more efficient bounds estimator yields more powerful inference. We prove that this desirable result holds for C I α 1 $CI_{\alpha }^{1}$ upper C upper I Subscript alpha Superscript 1 and C I α 2 $CI_{\alpha }^{2}$ upper C upper I Subscript alpha Superscript 2 , but not necessarily for C I α 3 $CI_{\alpha }^{3}$ upper C upper I Subscript alpha Superscript 3 or C I α 4 $CI_{\alpha }^{4}$ upper C upper I Subscript alpha Superscript 4 . In summary, within the class of models considered, C I α 1 $CI_{\alpha }^{1}$ upper C upper I Subscript alpha Superscript 1 and C I α 2 $CI_{\alpha }^{2}$ upper C upper I Subscript alpha Superscript 2 have identical power properties, and both compare favorably to C I α 3 $CI_{\alpha }^{3}$ upper C upper I Subscript alpha Superscript 3 and C I α 4 $CI_{\alpha }^{4}$ upper C upper I Subscript alpha Superscript 4 .