The informativeness of combined experimental and observational data under dynamic selection
动态选择下实验与观察数据结合的信息价值AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接研究动态选择下的处理效应识别、实验与观察数据结合及就业培训效果。
动态选择下实验与观察数据结合的信息价值AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The Average Treatment Effect on the Treated Survivors (ATETS; Vikström et al., 2018) captures a composite effect of time-varying treatment and dynamic selection into the survivor population. We address the problem of identifying this treatment-effect parameter in the absence of long-term experimental data, utilizing available long-term observational data instead. This poses a nontrivial challenge in practice, as dynamic selection compounds static selection in observational data. We establish two theoretical results. First, it is impossible to obtain informative bounds without model restrictions or auxiliary data. Second, to overturn this negative result, we explore the recent econometric developments in combining experimental and observational data (e.g., Athey et al., 2025; 2024) as a promising avenue; we find that exploiting short-term experimental data can be informative without imposing classical model restrictions. Building on Chesher and Rosen (2017), we further explore how to systematically derive sharp identification bounds, leveraging both novel data-combination principles and classical model restrictions. Estimation and inference procedures are also provided. Applying the proposed method, we investigate what can be learned about the long-run effects of job training programs on employment in the absence of long-term experimental data.