跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

本页为预印本版本;arXiv 收录、作者填写的期刊信息以及作者既有发表经历,都不单独证明本篇已接收。作者发表记录按 OpenAlex 身份与完整姓名、本站覆盖期刊 ISSN 及正式卷期核对,只展示已核实例,档案仍可能误合并。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确以倾向得分加权进行因果协变量调整、对齐目标估计量并减少总体差异造成的混杂,直接对应因果推断。

反馈分类问题

Improving operating characteristics of clinical trials by augmenting control arm using propensity score-weighted borrowing-by-parts power prior

利用倾向得分加权与分部借用幂先验增强临床试验对照组

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Apu Chandra Das
Sakib Salam
Aninda Roy
Rakhi Chowdhury
Antar Chandra Das
Ashim Chandra Das

利用倾向得分加权与分部借用幂先验增强临床试验对照组

研究问题
借用外部对照数据时,如何同时处理协变量分布差异和结果变异差异,在提升估计效率的同时减轻总体异质性带来的偏差?
方法与思路
作者先用倾向得分加权对齐协变量分布,再将外部加权似然通过分部借用幂先验纳入贝叶斯模型,为均值和方差设置不同借用参数。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称该框架可分别校准均值与方差信息借用,在中等协变量不平衡及结果异质性下,模拟估计比不借用和固定借用更高效稳定。
阅读关注点
应核对加权后的目标估计量、外部样本可比性与重叠要求、最小可信度指标如何确定借用参数,以及偏差和区间表现如何权衡。
阅读边界
所据为 arXiv 预印本,不能据此确认同行评审或期刊接收;摘要未说明未观测混杂的处理、具体模拟数值或更强异质性下的有效性。

原文摘要

Borrowing external data can improve estimation efficiency but may introduce bias when populations differ in covariate distributions or outcome variability. A proper balance needs to be maintained between the two datasets to justify the borrowing. We propose a propensity score weighting borrowing-by-parts power prior (PSW-BPP) that integrates causal covariate adjustment through propensity score weighting with a flexible Bayesian borrowing approach to address these challenges in a unified framework. The proposed approach first applies propensity score weighting to align the covariate distribution of the external data with that of the current study, thereby targeting a common estimand and reducing confounding due to population heterogeneity. The weighted external likelihood is then incorporated into a Bayesian model through a borrowing-by-parts power prior, which allows distinct power parameters for the mean and variance components of the likelihood, enabling differential and calibrated information borrowing. Additionally, we adopt the idea of the minimal plausibility index (mPI) to calculate the power parameters. This separate borrowing provides greater robustness to prior-data conflict compared with traditional power prior methods that impose a single borrowing parameter. We study the operating characteristics of PSW-BPP through extensive simulation and a real data example. Simulation studies demonstrate that PSW-BPP yields more efficient and stable estimation than no borrowing and fixed borrowing, particularly under moderate covariate imbalance and outcome heterogeneity. The proposed framework offers a principled and extensible methodological contribution for Bayesian inference with external data in observational and hybrid study designs.

笔记与分组