跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要关注复杂调查中的测量误差校正与一般回归,虽使用住户面板调查数据,但未说明纵向面板模型或因果目标。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Chris Skinner
Jae Kwang Kim

利用二元调查过程辅助数据校正调查分析中的测量误差

研究问题
如何利用提示测量误差存在的二元调查过程辅助变量,在复杂调查设计下校正收入协变量误差并估计回归关系?
方法与思路
作者设定允许正态或 t 分布测量误差的参数模型,讨论回归系数识别,并提出伪最大似然和参数化分数插补方法。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称通过模拟与英国住户调查应用评估方法,相比仅使用准确观测的简单方案,所提校正可降低偏差并改善精度。
阅读关注点
应核对辅助变量如何关联误差、识别所需假设、复杂抽样权重与方差处理,以及误差分布错设对校正结果的影响。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的 OpenAlex 索引摘要;识别假设和改善幅度未说明,使用住户面板调查数据不等于建立面板模型,亦不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

Paradata refers here to data at unit level on an observed auxiliary variable, not usually of direct scientific interest, which may be informative about the quality of the survey data for the unit. There is increasing interest among survey researchers in how to use such data. Its use to reduce bias from nonresponse has received more attention so far than its use to correct for measurement error. This article considers the latter with a focus on binary paradata indicating the presence of measurement error. A motivating application concerns inference about a regression model, where earnings is a covariate measured with error and whether a respondent refers to pay records is the paradata variable. We specify a parametric model allowing for either normally or t-distributed measurement errors and discuss the assumptions required to identify the regression coefficients. We propose two estimation approaches that take account of complex survey designs: pseudo-maximum likelihood estimation and parametric fractional imputation. These approaches are assessed in a simulation study and are applied to a regression of a measure of deprivation given earnings and other covariates using British Household Panel Survey data. It is found that the proposed approach to correcting for measurement error reduces bias and improves on the precision of a simple approach based on accurate observations. We outline briefly possible extensions to uses of this approach at earlier stages in the survey process. Supplemental materials are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文