Inference for Local Parameters in Convexity Constrained Models
凸性约束模型中局部参数的统计推断AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要关注通用形状约束模型的局部推断;虽包含密度估计,但未明确研究所列分位数或经济分布效应。
凸性约束模型中局部参数的统计推断AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
In this article, we develop automated inference methods for “local” parameters in a collection of convexity constrained models based on the natural constrained tuning-free estimators. A canonical example is given by the univariate convex regression model, in which automated inference is drawn for the function value, the function derivative at a fixed interior point, and the anti-mode of the convex regression function, based on the widely used tuning-free, piecewise linear convex least squares estimator (LSE). The key to our inference proposal in this model is a pivotal joint limit distribution theory for the LS estimates of the local parameters, normalized appropriately by the length of certain data-driven linear piece of the convex LSE. Such a pivotal limiting distribution instantly gives rise to confidence intervals for these local parameters, whose construction requires almost no more effort than computing the convex LSE itself. This inference method in the convex regression model is a special case of a general inference machinery that covers a number of convexity constrained models in which a limit distribution theory is available for model-specific estimators. Concrete models include: (i) log-concave density estimation, (ii) s-concave density estimation, (iii) convex nonincreasing density estimation, (iv) concave bathtub-shaped hazard function estimation, and (v) concave distribution function estimation from corrupted data. The proposed confidence intervals for all these models are proved to have asymptotically exact coverage and oracle length, and require no further information than the estimator itself. We provide extensive simulation evidence that validates our theoretical results. Real data applications and comparisons with competing methods are given to illustrate the usefulness of our inference proposals. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.