Model Selection for Multivalued-Treatment Policy Learning in Observational Studies
观察性研究中多值处理政策学习的模型选择AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确研究观察性多值处理的福利与政策学习,并使用双重稳健估计及交叉拟合。
观察性研究中多值处理政策学习的模型选择AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This study investigates the policy learning problem in observational studies, where the treatment variable can be multivalued and the propensity scores are unknown. We approximate the optimal policy in a global policy class with infinite complexity (VC/Natarajan) dimension, using a sequence of sieve policy classes with finite complexity dimension. The optimal policy within each sieve class is estimated by maximizing the empirical welfare, constructed through the doubly robust moment condition and cross-fitting method. To select the suitable sieve space, we maximize the penalized empirical welfare, with the penalty determined by either the Rademacher complexity or a holdout method. We establish oracle inequalities that demonstrate the bias and variance trade-off achieved by the data-driven policy estimator. We also investigate two specific sieve selections: (1) a monotone single index model and (2) a systematic discretization method, which uses conventional sieve results for smooth functions such as linear sieves and deep neural networks. In the empirical study, we apply our method to examine the policy of assigning individuals to job training of different lengths.