K-Class Estimators: The Optimum Normalization for Finite Samples
K 类估计量:有限样本的最优归一化AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确涉及内生变量与 K 类估计,但未说明结构经济模型或因果识别目标,细分分类依据不足。
反馈分类问题K 类估计量:有限样本的最优归一化AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
Frequently, in estimating an equation, one is interested in a particular set of normalized coefficients. There is still a normalization problem, however, for if an equation contains m 1 endogenous variables, there are m 1 ways to estimate the same coefficients. The purpose of this article is to determine the optimum normalization for finite samples. Restricting the analysis to k-class estimators and employing Kadane's small sample technique [9], let p 2 i denote the correlation coefficient between the ith endogenous variable and the disturbance. Then, measuring “endogenousness” by p 2 i , this article shows that subject to several important qualifications, one should normalize on the most endogenous variable.