跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:论文核心是适用于复杂模型的通用模拟偏差校正,收入分布只是示例,尚不足以确定专门领域归属。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Stéphane Guerrier
Yanyuan Ma

复杂模型的基于模拟的偏差校正方法

研究问题
复杂模型中便于计算但有偏甚至不一致的初始估计量,能否通过模拟校正获得一致性并减少有限样本偏差?
方法与思路
作者扩展间接推断与bootstrap的不同版本,构造模拟估计框架,并将迭代bootstrap联系到间接推断的优化问题。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称某版间接推断与迭代bootstrap等价,给出一致性和偏差校正性质,并以收入分布及潜变量模型说明用途。
阅读关注点
应核对初始估计允许的不一致形式、模拟校正的成立条件和迭代收敛;所给偏差阶数排版需查原文确认。
阅读边界
仅据版本未注明的索引摘要,无法判断等价性与校正条件。偏差阶数的指数排版不清,不能据此重构公式或确认精确速率。

原文摘要

Along with the ever increasing data size and model complexity, an important challenge frequently encountered in constructing new estimators or in implementing a classical one such as the maximum likelihood estimator, is the computational aspect of the estimation procedure. To carry out estimation, approximate methods such as pseudo-likelihood functions or approximated estimating equations are increasingly used in practice as these methods are typically easier to implement numerically although they can lead to inconsistent and/or biased estimators. In this context, we extend and provide refinements on the known bias correction properties of two simulation-based methods, respectively, indirect inference and bootstrap, each with two alternatives. These results allow one to build a framework defining simulation-based estimators that can be implemented for complex models. Indeed, based on a biased or even inconsistent estimator, several simulation-based methods can be used to define new estimators that are both consistent and with reduced finite sample bias. This framework includes the classical method of the indirect inference for bias correction without requiring specification of an auxiliary model. We demonstrate the equivalence between one version of the indirect inference and the iterative bootstrap, both correct sample biases up to the order n− 3. The iterative method can be thought of as a computationally efficient algorithm to solve the optimization problem of the indirect inference. Our results provide different tools to correct the asymptotic as well as finite sample biases of estimators and give insight on which method should be applied for the problem at hand. The usefulness of the proposed approach is illustrated with the estimation of robust income distributions and generalized linear latent variable models. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文