Poisson Overdispersion Estimates Based on the Method of Asymmetric Maximum Likelihood
基于非对称最大似然的 Poisson 过度离散估计AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要直接以条件分位数回归及分位数间距研究响应分布的离散和不对称性。
基于非对称最大似然的 Poisson 过度离散估计AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
A common difficulty in regression problems with Poisson (or binomial or other exponential family) response variables is over-dispersion: the scatter around the fitted regression is too large by the standards of Poisson variability. This article concerns the description, estimation, and testing of various patterns of overdispersion, with particular emphasis on the Poisson case. Asymmetric maximum likelihood (AML) is a method of fitting regressions for the conditional percentiles of the response variable as a function of the predictors (e.g., the conditional 90th percentile of y given x). Distances between the various regression percentiles give a direct assessment of overdispersion. The discussion is carried through in terms of an archaeological data set, where we see that the counts are overdispersed by a factor of 1.35 in one part of the covariate space, but not at all in another. Moreover, the overdispersion is about 40% larger in the positive response direction than in the negative. The AML estimates are easy to compute and relate nicely to the usual maximum likelihood estimates for generalized linear regression.