跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:分位数函数在此用于通用拟合优度检验,摘要未研究经济分位数或分布效应。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
V. N. Lariccia

平滑拟合优度检验:分位数函数方法

研究问题
如何基于分位数函数构造计算简便的平滑拟合优度检验,并使检验针对指定备择,同时处理完整与删失数据?
方法与思路
作者把原假设的分位数函数嵌入更大的线性模型,通过回归方法检验新增项系数,并构造指数性检验。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,所提程序具有与传统平滑检验相近的功效性质,可用于完整和Ⅱ型删失数据,并便于针对备择方向设计。
阅读关注点
应核对位置与尺度原假设的限定、备择线性模型的选择、删失处理,以及定向功效与不一致备择之间的关系。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化;摘要指出平滑类检验对某些备择不一致,不能理解为对所有偏离均有检测保证。

原文摘要

A quantile function based analog to Neyman's smooth tests for goodness-of-fit hypotheses is developed. These procedures possess asymptotic and small-sample power properties similar to those for smooth tests. They are, however, computationally simple, applicable to both complete and Type II censored data, and easily focused in the direction of any specific set of alternatives. These results are used to develop a new test for exponentiality. Only location/scale null hypotheses will be considered. The ideas are easily adapted to other types of nulls, however. Neyman first proposed smooth tests for the goodness-of-fit hypothesis. As stated by Kopecky and Pierce and by Rayner and Best, the basic idea behind these tests is to embed the null density in a larger exponential family. The procedure is then based upon the likelihood-ratio test statistic for testing that the additional parameters equal zero. Smooth type tests may be viewed as a compromise between omnibus test procedures, with generally low power in all directions, and procedures whose power is focused in the direction of a specific alternative. It is easily shown that any of the smooth type tests are inconsistent for some alternatives. Further, as stated by Koziol, one of the main criticisms of these tests has been that the larger exponential families employed seem to be selected more for mathematical convenience than as statistically reasonable alternative distributions. Results of Monte Carlo studies by Miller and Quesenberry and others, however, indicate that smooth tests perform well for a wide range of alternatives. The proposed tests are developed by embedding the quantile function associated with the null hypothesis into a larger linear model and then using typical regression techniques to test that the coefficients of the added terms in this model vanish. These statistics are interpreted and asymptotically have many of the properties of the corresponding regression tests. Further, as with Neyman's smooth tests, if the alternative model is properly selected, the resulting procedure provides a good omnibus test.

笔记与分组