跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要以 GARCH 条件方差函数的正确设定及边界参数下的检验为核心,直接对应金融波动率建模与推断。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Giuseppe Cavaliere
Indeewara Perera
Anders Rahbek

干扰参数位于边界时的 GARCH 设定检验

研究问题
当 GARCH 的真实参数可能位于参数空间边界,使检验极限分布复杂依赖干扰参数时,如何检验条件方差设定?
方法与思路
作者以中心化残差平方标记的经验过程构造两类检验,并将生成自助样本的参数估计按适当速率向边界收缩。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称新自助法在一般条件下具有渐近有效性且计算简便,也讨论参数按根号样本量倒数速率趋近边界的推断。
阅读关注点
应核对边界收缩速率、残差过程的构造、固定参数与局部趋边界序列的区别,以及相较 Ljung–Box 检验的互补范围。
阅读边界
仅据所给 OpenAlex 版本摘要解读;摘要未列出一般条件、局部序列的完整有效性要求及数值结果,不能推断刊本变化。

原文摘要

This article develops tests for the correct specification of the conditional variance function in GARCH models when the true parameter may lie on the boundary of the parameter space. The test statistics considered are of Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramér-von Mises type, and are based on empirical processes marked by centered squared residuals. The limiting distributions of the test statistics depend on unknown nuisance parameters in a nontrivial way, making the tests difficult to implement. We therefore introduce a novel bootstrap procedure which is shown to be asymptotically valid under general conditions, irrespective of the presence of nuisance parameters on the boundary. The proposed bootstrap approach is based on shrinking of the parameter estimates used to generate the bootstrap sample toward the boundary of the parameter space at a proper rate. It is simple to implement and fast in applications, as the associated test statistics have simple closed form expressions. Although the bootstrap test is designed for a data generating process with fixed parameters (i.e., independent of the sample size n), we also discuss how to obtain valid inference for sequences of DGPs with parameters approaching the boundary at the n−1/2 rate. A simulation study demonstrates that the new tests: (i) have excellent finite sample behavior in terms of empirical rejection probabilities under the null as well as under the alternative; (ii) provide a useful complement to existing procedures based on Ljung-Box type approaches. Two data examples illustrate the implementation of the proposed tests in applications.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文