Marginal proportional hazards models for multiple event-time data
多事件时间数据的边际比例风险模型AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要聚焦多事件时间与生存分析,未直接对应所列面板、因果或金融风险细分领域。
多事件时间数据的边际比例风险模型AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
The Wei et al. (1989) semiparametric approach to the analysis of multiple event‐time data assumes that each event time is related to covariates through a proportional hazards model with a completely unspecified baseline hazard function, but does not impose any constraint on the joint distribution of different event times. As a result of the order restriction, it is not clear whether or not event times can simultaneously satisfy their respective marginal proportional hazards assumption, while having continuous joint distribution. This leads to inability to conduct simulation studies. We resolve this issue by constructing parametric models for multiple event times with proper joint density functions and marginal proportional hazards. Simulation studies are reported that compare efficiencies of the method of Wei et al. (1989) and of the maximum likelihood approach.