跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要明确估计内疚厌恶结构模型,并比较不同信念设定下的支付意愿,直接对应微观行为结构估计。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Charles Bellemare
Alexander Sebald
Martin Strobel

避免内疚的支付意愿:均衡信念与陈述信念模型估计

研究问题
人们愿意支付多少以避免让另一位参与者失望,并且均衡信念设定、陈述信念与偏好的相关性如何影响这一估计?
方法与思路
作者用荷兰代表性人口样本的提议与回应实验估计内疚厌恶结构模型,比较均衡高阶信念与允许信念、偏好相关的陈述信念模型。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要报告,每避免让提议者失望 €1,回应者愿付 €0.40—€0.80;不控制偏好与陈述信念相关性时,支付意愿估计约高估一倍。
阅读关注点
应核对内疚效用与高阶信念的定义、陈述信念的获取方式,以及偏好和信念相关性如何识别并影响支付意愿估计。
阅读边界
仅据所给 Crossref 摘要,无法判断参数识别和估计不确定性;未发现社会经济特征显著相关,也不能说明这些特征完全无作用。

原文摘要

Abstract We estimate structural models of guilt aversion to measure the population level of willingness to pay (WTP) to avoid feeling guilt by letting down another player. We compare estimates of WTP under the assumption that higher‐order beliefs are in equilibrium (i.e., consistent with the choice distribution) with models estimated using stated beliefs which relax the equilibrium requirement. We estimate WTP in the latter case by allowing stated beliefs to be correlated with guilt aversion, thus controlling for a possible source of a consensus effect. All models are estimated using data from an experiment of proposal and response conducted with a large and representative sample of the Dutch population. Our range of estimates suggests that responders are willing to pay between €0.40 and €0.80 to avoid letting down proposers by €1. Furthermore, we find that WTP estimated using stated beliefs is substantially overestimated (by a factor of two) when correlation between preferences and beliefs is not controlled for. Finally, we find no evidence that WTP is significantly related to the observable socio‐economic characteristics of players. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文