跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要研究遗传特征数量的贝叶斯估计,未明确对应所列经济计量细分方向。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Stefano Favaro
Lorenzo Masoero
Tamara Broderick

用于未观测遗传变异估计的贝叶斯非参数缩放过程先验

研究问题
如何估计尚未观察到的特征数量,使后验利用样本中不同特征的实际信息,同时保留解析计算与解释上的便利?
方法与思路
作者提出稳定 Beta 缩放过程先验,使未观测特征数具有负二项后验,并让后验同时依赖样本量及已观察到的不同特征数。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称新先验扩展完全随机测度先验的后验表达能力,估计形式简单且计算高效,并报告合成与癌症数据中的精度和覆盖改善。
阅读关注点
应核对特征采样模型、先验参数的处理、负二项后验成立的条件,以及精度和覆盖比较是否采用一致的样本规模与调参方式。
阅读边界
仅据 OpenAlex 索引摘要,稿件版本未注明,不能推断刊本变化;所述完全随机测度限制以固定先验参数为前提,比较的具体数值未提供。

原文摘要

There is a growing interest in the estimation of the number of unseen features, mostly driven by biological applications. A recent work brought out a peculiar property of the popular completely random measures (CRMs) as prior models in Bayesian nonparametric (BNP) inference for the unseen-features problem: for fixed prior's parameters, they all lead to a Poisson posterior distribution for the number of unseen features, which depends on the sampling information only through the sample size. CRMs are thus not a flexible prior model for the unseen-features problem and, while the Poisson posterior distribution may be appealing for analytical tractability and ease of interpretability, its independence from the sampling information makes the BNP approach a questionable oversimplification, with posterior inferences being completely determined by the estimation of unknown prior's parameters. In this article, we introduce the stable-Beta scaled process (SB-SP) prior, and we show that it allows to enrich the posterior distribution of the number of unseen features arising under CRM priors, while maintaining its analytical tractability and interpretability. That is, the SB-SP prior leads to a negative Binomial posterior distribution, which depends on the sampling information through the sample size and the number of distinct features, with corresponding estimates being simple, linear in the sampling information and computationally efficient. We apply our BNP approach to synthetic data and to real cancer genomic data, showing that: (i) it outperforms the most popular parametric and nonparametric competitors in terms of estimation accuracy; (ii) it provides improved coverage for the estimation with respect to a BNP approach under CRM priors. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文