跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要讨论通用高维线性回归的系数检验和多重检验,未给出因果、面板、时间序列或金融模型的直接文本依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Wei Lan
Ping-Shou Zhong
Runze Li
Hansheng Wang
Chih-Ling Tsai

高维线性模型中单个回归系数的检验

研究问题
当协变量数量超过样本量时,如何检验单个线性回归系数,并在异方差及多重检验情形下维持有效推断和变量选择?
方法与思路
作者通过相关预测变量筛选控制与目标协变量高度相关的变量,再用普通最小二乘估计目标系数,结合z检验和错误发现率控制。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称目标系数估计在异方差下仍一致且渐近正态,并称基于各变量检验的多重检验可控制错误发现率、实现一致模型选择。
阅读关注点
应核对相关变量筛选的阈值与遗漏变量控制条件、异方差下标准误计算,以及错误发现率控制和模型选择一致性的要求。
阅读边界
仅据所给出版社摘要,不能确认筛选后推断所需的相关结构、信号强度或维数增长限制;模拟和应用的数值表现未说明。

原文摘要

In linear regression models with high dimensional data, the classical z-test (or t-test) for testing the significance of each single regression coefficient is no longer applicable. This is mainly because the number of covariates exceeds the sample size. In this paper, we propose a simple and novel alternative by introducing the Correlated Predictors Screening (CPS) method to control for predictors that are highly correlated with the target covariate. Accordingly, the classical ordinary least squares approach can be employed to estimate the regression coefficient associated with the target covariate. In addition, we demonstrate that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal even if the random errors are heteroscedastic. This enables us to apply the z-test to assess the significance of each covariate. Based on the p-value obtained from testing the significance of each covariate, we further conduct multiple hypothesis testing by controlling the false discovery rate at the nominal level. Then, we show that the multiple hypothesis testing achieves consistent model selection. Simulation studies and empirical examples are presented to illustrate the finite sample performance and the usefulness of the proposed method, respectively.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文