Test of Significance for High-Dimensional Thresholds with Application to Individualized Minimal Clinically Important Difference
高维阈值参数的显著性检验:个体化最小临床重要差异应用AI 解读 ↓
本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。
DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。
引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。
关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。
AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:摘要中的阈值是临床决策参数,未明确涉及离散选择、结构变化或因果效应识别。
高维阈值参数的显著性检验:个体化最小临床重要差异应用AI 解读 ↓
正在核对关联版本…
正在核对对应版本的资源…
This work is motivated by learning the individualized minimal clinically important difference, a vital concept to assess clinical importance in various biomedical studies. We formulate the scientific question into a high-dimensional statistical problem where the parameter of interest lies in an individualized linear threshold. The goal is to develop a hypothesis testing procedure for the significance of a single element in this parameter as well as of a linear combination of this parameter. The difficulty dues to the high-dimensional nuisance in developing such a testing procedure, and also stems from the fact that this high-dimensional threshold model is nonregular and the limiting distribution of the corresponding estimator is nonstandard. To deal with these challenges, we construct a test statistic via a new bias-corrected smoothed decorrelated score approach, and establish its asymptotic distributions under both null and local alternative hypotheses. We propose a double-smoothing approach to select the optimal bandwidth in our test statistic and provide theoretical guarantees for the selected bandwidth. We conduct simulation studies to demonstrate how our proposed procedure can be applied in empirical studies. We apply the proposed method to a clinical trial where the scientific goal is to assess the clinical importance of a surgery procedure. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.