跳到正文
← 返回论文列表与筛选
阅读说明

本页整理公开书目信息,不生成学术质量评分。AI 解读根据题名及所注明的摘要或原文片段生成,未完成全文核验,可能有误;具体假设、证明与结论请核对原文。摘要保留来源文本,未经模型改写。

DOI 首次登记不等于接收或发表日期。部分更正、评论等条目没有独立摘要;缺少可靠材料时保留待补状态。

引用量采用 OpenAlex 单条关联记录,不合计多个记录;关联记录可能包含正式发表版本,不等于此版本单独引用。缺失不视为零,引用指标不代表论文质量。

关注作者按书目中的完整姓名匹配,同名和姓名变体需人工辨别。相关论文先按共享细分方向和具体方法排列,再参考通用方法与发表日期。

分类依据与纠错

AI 根据所提供的论文材料归类:论文核心是通用贝叶斯模型选择理论,应用跨越多个模型类型,缺乏将其主方向限定到所列细分领域的依据。

反馈分类问题

正在核对关联版本…

代码、数据与补充材料

正在核对对应版本的资源…

关注这篇论文的作者
Yong Li
Nianling Wang
Jun Yu
Tao Zeng

贝叶斯模型选择中偏差信息准则的理论依据与应用

研究问题
利用 MCMC 输出进行贝叶斯模型选择时,偏差信息准则如何衡量代入预测分布的偏离程度,先验又如何影响拟合与复杂度权衡?
方法与思路
作者在正则条件下分析偏差信息准则对预期 KL 散度的渐近估计性质,并推导该准则和有效参数数量的高阶展开以刻画先验影响。
材料陈述的贡献
摘要称,该准则对相应预期 KL 散度渐近无偏,并通过离散选择、随机前沿及 copula 应用展示模型比较和预测准确性方面的表现。
阅读关注点
应核对代入预测分布与目标 KL 风险的定义、正则条件和先验作用,以及各应用的比较基准、预测验证方式和高阶项解释。
阅读边界
仅依据所给 RePEc 出版社摘要;正则条件与预测评估细节未说明,应用中的模型优劣不能推广至其他数据或模型,也不能推断版本变化。

原文摘要

This paper provides a theoretical justification for the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC) as a Bayesian model selection tool using MCMC output. Unlike Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), which balance model adequacy against complexity without considering prior information, DIC incorporates priors into this trade-off. The contributions of this paper are two-fold. First, it demonstrates that when a plug-in predictive distribution — obtained by substituting parameter values with their optimal estimates to yield the plug-in estimated sampling distribution — is used under a set of regularity conditions, the DIC serves as an asymptotically unbiased estimator of the expected Kullback–Leibler divergence between the data-generating process and the plug-in predictive distribution. Second, it develops higher-order expansions for DIC and the effective number of parameters, highlighting the effect of the priors. We employ DIC to compare discrete-choice models, stochastic frontier models, and copula models in three empirical applications; the results align with theoretical expectations, showing the utility of DIC as a versatile tool outperforming the traditional model selection criteria. It is found that the logit model is better than the probit model for investigating the marginal effects of parents’ education on children’s completion of high school. Additionally, the stochastic frontier model with an exponential distribution better fits electricity utility data than the normal distribution. Finally, the chosen copula models for S&P index returns exhibit heavy tails and strong tail dependence. By modelling the effect of priors through higher order expansions, we also find the above empirical models outperforming their benchmark counterparts in terms of predictive accuracy.

笔记与分组
相关领域论文